The Game Concludes: Did America kill jazz?

The last suspect on our list is none other than the birthplace of jazz. We gave birth to this great American art form and then, a few decades later, developed some sort of Abraham complex and slew it… allegedly. For the prosecution we have Stuart Nicholson, author of the book entitled “Is Jazz Dead? Or has it Moved to a New Address”:

For years Americans have regarded European jazz with the same tolerant smile they reserve for Japanese baseball. But something is stirring in the Old World. A generation of musicians is emerging from Europe's jazz underground, and now they're raising a tolerant smile at the mention of American jazz. Talk to them about the current state of the music, and it's as if an old and dear friend has passed away. They believe American jazz is retreating into the past while Europe is moving the music into the 21st century.

-Stuart Nicholson, 2001

Nicholson essentially goes on to argue that American jazz is no longer innovative. We all share the philosophy of Wynton Marsalis and simply hang onto the traditions of the past as though they were law. The reason 80% of Ken Burns’ documentary on jazz was before WWII is because sometime shortly after that jazz died, along with its innovative nature. Where the European jazz scene once followed America’s lead, they now have completely moved on, while America still lies in the 40s. He presents quotes of European artists like the Norewegian pianist Brugge Wesseltoft as evidence:

“I think American jazz somehow has really stopped, maybe in the late 70’s, early 80’s. I haven’t heard one interesting American record in the last 20 years. It’s like a museum, presenting stuff that’s already been done.”

-Brugge Wesseltoft, 2001

Certainly this evidence is quite damning. It’s really America’s own fault for not creating anything new since 1965. We all blindly follow the lead of Wynton Marsalis, who is obviously the only jazz musician worth mentioning in America today, and that has landed us on this retreat into the past. Nicholson goes on to tell us that if American jazz is to ever have a hope of sticking around, it will have to survive of a protective government subsidy, since there are no audiences to support it anymore. This definitely sounds like we’ve finally closed the case and found our murderer, but before the gavel sounds, there is one counterargument I would like to make.

Stuart Nicholson is an idiot.

Wait one second! There hasn’t been any American contribution to the innovation of jazz for over 20 years? I would like to call the following musicians as witnesses to the contrary:

Ralph Alessi

David Gilmore

Tyshawn Sorey

David Binney

Jason Moran

Gary Thomas

Steve Coleman

Greg Osby

Mark Turner

Dave Douglas

Lonnie Plaxico

Robin Eubanks

Kurt Rosenwinkle

No, Wynton Marsalis is not on that list, but there is a reason his name sparks controversy among American jazz musicians. We don’t all share his philosophy of music. It’s great that Marsalis keeps tradition alive. I mean, it’s always a good thing to remember and appreciate your roots, but his music is far from the rule in America.

That being said, Europe is certainly doing some great things with jazz. They are now at a point where they are no longer imitating American jazz as they did in the past, but have now taken the music in a new direction of their own. This is wonderful, but it doesn’t mean that American jazz is dead. Jazz in America is very much alive. In 1972 there were only 15 universities that offered degrees in jazz studies. That number in America alone is in the hundreds today, stretching from coast to coast. Every year, American schools turn out hundreds of new jazz musicians into the field.

Jazz is not dead. Period. What started in the American south in the late 19^th century has now spread worldwide. Musicians from all over the world can commune with this one common language. Jazz in America has seen more than its share of bad times, but that certainly doesn’t mean that it’s dead. Far from it, in fact. And now, without a victim, we have no case. America is cleared of all charges and free to go listen to some new jazz. Case dismissed.

The Game Continues: It was technology, in the 1970s, with...a candlestick?

For those that believe jazz is dead, they typically cite the 1970s as the time of death. The 70s saw the birth of a cultural revolution, the likes of which had never been seen in the US. This decade saw a number of events which would begin to shape the culture we have today. The 70s was a period marked by the end of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, the Watergate scandal and President Nixon’s subsequent resignation, Steve Jobs introduces the Apple Macintosh PC and suddenly the population finds their obsession with personal technology, and the British Invasion dominates the music scene with groups like Led Zepplin, The Who, Black Sabbath etc, as well as the birth of heavy metal. The 70s also saw the first real use of electronic music and synthesizers, and by 1976, the use of digital recording. The foundation and building blocks for the pop music of today had been laid out, all in a very short time.

In a very short time, we see the popularity of jazz give way to funk, fusion, British rock, and heavy metal. Our world becomes much faster paced, and the evolution of music gets kicked into overdrive. The “quantity over quality” mentality begins to kick in, as the sheer amount of music available grows exponentially as well as the accessibility of music due to the advances in technology. America was quickly sprinting to the digital age.

Still, I’m not convinced that the case against technology for the murder of jazz has been substantiated. Certainly I concede that the 70s brought about vast change, not only in the world of music, but reconstructed our entire culture. Technology has certainly changed the world of music more still since the 70s. Between technological innovations such as Auto-Tune and GarageBand some begin to worry that someday actual musicians will no longer be needed. Pop stars today can almost be manufactured, and after hearing some music today I use the word “almost” very generously. But there was still great jazz being made in spite of this cultural revolution. Even though jazz was being pulled into a plethora of directions, there were still those that held onto more traditional forms of the music which is so deeply intertwined in American heritage. The big bands of Duke Ellington and Count Basie were still very active and continued to play even after these legends died (1974 and 1984 respectively). Free jazz players who had made a name for themselves in the 60s such as Ornette Coleman, Sun Ra and the Art Ensemble of Chicago. The 1970s also brought about the inclusion of jazz into academia. In 1972 only 15 schools in the U.S. offered degrees in jazz studies. This number would increase to 72 in the next 10 years.

All in all, I would say that while the 70s brought about great change in music and in culture, it cannot be appropriately cited as either time or cause of death of jazz. Jazz evolved during this time, and in many ways became something new. This helped shape our culture and lay the groundwork for the music of today. Change doesn’t mean better, and it doesn’t mean worse. Most importantly though, it does not mean “dead”. The case against technology and the 1970s is hereby dismissed.